November 7, 2018
8:45 am EDT
At SIA Wealth Management everything we do is based on Relative Strength Analysis. We evaluate the Relative Strength between asset classes giving us insight into money flows on a large scale, and from this select top ranked investments.
Market Commentary By:
Colin Cieszynski, CFA, CMT
Chief Market Strategist
+1 (647) 282-4428
Stocks in Europe and North America have put on their rally caps this morning as investors applaud what could turn out to be a Goldilocks midterm election result for equities. As is common in midterm elections, there was a swing toward the opposition Democrats, but not the big blue tsunami they had been hoping for. The Democrats did manage to retake control of the House with a small majority but the Republicans increased their majority in the Senate.
Stocks have generally done well under President Trump to date along with the US economy, but had retreated in recent weeks partly on election uncertainty. Last night result gives the Democrats the ability to slow his agenda and potentially keep him from going too far, but doesnâ€™t give them enough power to completely derail him or to take a serious run at impeachment. Historically, US stock markets have really hated impeachment most of all, dropping about 20% in 1998 when the Republicans went after President Clinton and plunging about 40% in 1973-74 when the Democrats drove President Nixon out of office. For stocks, this result looks just about right, not too Democrat, not too Republican.
Gridlock is goodâ€¦Â : )
The biggest action this morning has been in crude oil where both Brent and WTI have bounced back from yesterdayâ€™s tumble that took WTI to its lowest level since April, gaining 1.9% and 1.6% respectively. The rally was sparked by press reports suggesting that Saudi Arabia and OPEC could be looking at more production cuts in 2019. Itâ€™s too early to speculate if any cuts may actually materialize and how much, but what is important is that this shows that the Saudis are prepared to defend the oil price, by talking it up initially.
Recent action in oil prices suggest that we may have entered a sweet spot between the price Saudi Arabia needs for its Aramco IPO to go through and the price the United States is willing or able to tolerate before political or inflationary problems arise. This happy zone appears to be about $60-80/bbl for WTI and $70-90/bbl for Brent.
Last month as Brent approached $90, President Trump started complaining about the price and added supply to the market by enabling some of the biggest oil importers to keep purchasing oil from Iran exempting them briefly from the sanctions that had reduced supply. With recent reports showing wage inflation on the rise, the US canâ€™t afford an energy price spike potentially forcing the Fed to accelerate rate hikes.
This week, with WTI approaching $60, Saudi Arabia has apparently started talking about cutting supply next year to shore up the price. Itâ€™s a big chess game. Last night API reported a 7.8 mmbbl increase in US oil inventories, with the street expecting a 2.4 mmbbl increase from DOE this morning. While we may see some intraday choppiness on this news, these broader ranges are now starting to look well established and defended by the big political players.
Disclaimer:Â SIA Wealth Management Inc. (SIAWM) specifically represents that it does not give investment advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment whatsoever. This information has been prepared without regard to any particular investor’s investment objectives, financial situation, and needs. None of the information contained in this document constitutes an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security or other investment or an offer to provide investment services of any kind. As such, advisors and their clients should not act on any recommendation (express or implied) or information in this report without obtaining specific advice in relation to their accounts and should not rely on information herein as the primary basis for their investment decisions. Information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources, believed to be reliable.Â SIAWM nor its third party content providers make any representations or warranties or take any responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of any recommendation or information contained herein and shall not be liable for any errors, inaccuracies or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Any statements nonfactual in nature constitute only current opinions, which are subject to change without notice.